Getting Started

In the area of estate planning and probate, it is important to have a clear understanding of the different methods of distribution. Two commonly used methods are per stirpes and per capita distribution. These terms may sound complex, but they play a crucial role in determining how assets are distributed among beneficiaries. In this article, we will look at the differences between per stirpes and per capita distribution, explain their implications and highlight their importance in the financial field.

Per Stirpes Distribution

Per stirpes, a Latin term meaning “by the roots,” is a method of distribution that ensures that a deceased person’s assets are passed down to his or her descendants in a specific manner. In this method, each branch of the family receives an equal share of the inheritance, regardless of the number of people in each branch. The primary factor that distinguishes per stirpes from per capita distribution is the representation of deceased beneficiaries through their lineal descendants.

To better understand per stirpes, consider a scenario where an individual, John, has three children: Sarah, Mark, and Emily. Unfortunately, Sarah predeceases John, leaving two children, Alex and Lily. Under a per stirpes distribution, when John dies, his estate would be divided equally between his living children, Mark and Emily. However, Sarah’s share would be represented by her children, Alex and Lily, who would share equally in their mother’s estate.

Per stirpes distribution ensures that each branch of the family receives a fair share, even if some beneficiaries are no longer alive. It recognizes the principle of representation by allowing the descendants of a deceased beneficiary to inherit on his or her behalf.

Per Capita Distribution

Per capita, a Latin term meaning “by the head,” is another method of distributing assets among beneficiaries. Unlike per stirpes, per capita distribution does not consider the branches of a family. Instead, it focuses on dividing the estate equally among the living beneficiaries, regardless of their relationship to the deceased.

To illustrate per capita distribution, let’s consider the previous example of John, Sarah, Mark, and Emily. If John were to die and per capita distribution were used, his estate would be divided equally among his living children: Mark and Emily. Sarah’s share would not pass to her children, Alex and Lily, because per capita distribution does not consider the representation of deceased beneficiaries.

In a per capita distribution, each person is treated as an independent unit and the assets are divided equally among them. This method ensures that all living beneficiaries receive an equal share of the estate, regardless of their relationship to the deceased.

Effects of Per Stirpes Distribution

Per stirpes distribution has significant implications, especially when it comes to intergenerational wealth transfer. This method ensures that assets are distributed to the descendants of a deceased beneficiary, allowing wealth to remain within a particular branch of the family. It recognizes the importance of lineage and provides a mechanism for preserving family legacies.

However, per stirpes distribution can create complexities in certain situations. For example, if a deceased beneficiary has multiple children, the assets may be further divided among their descendants, potentially resulting in smaller individual inheritances. In addition, if a beneficiary’s descendants cannot be identified or are no longer living, determining the rightful heirs can be difficult.

Effects of Per Capita Distribution

Per capita distribution, on the other hand, emphasizes equality among the beneficiaries, regardless of their family relationship to the deceased. This method ensures that each living beneficiary receives an equal share of the estate, promoting fairness and equity in distribution.

Per capita distribution simplifies the inheritance process by treating each individual as an independent unit. It eliminates the need to trace family branches and determine representation for deceased beneficiaries. However, in situations where preserving family legacy and lineage is a priority, per capita distribution may not be consistent with the intentions of the deceased.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between per stirpes and per capita distribution is critical to estate planning and wealth transfer. While both methods aim to distribute assets among beneficiaries, they take different approaches. Per stirpes distribution focuses on family branches and representation, ensuring that each branch receives a fair share. Per capita distribution, on the other hand, emphasizes an equal distribution among all living beneficiaries without regard to family relationships.

The choice between per stirpes and per capita distribution depends on several factors, including family dynamics, wealth preservation goals, and individual preferences. It is advisable to consult with legal and financial professionals to determine the most appropriate distribution method based on specific circumstances. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of these distribution methods, individuals can make informed decisions to protect their wealth and effectively provide for their loved ones.

FAQs

What is the difference between a per stirpes and a per capita distribution?

A per stirpes distribution is a method of distributing assets among beneficiaries in a will or trust based on their family line or branch. On the other hand, a per capita distribution is a method of distributing assets among beneficiaries equally, regardless of their family line or branch.

How does a per stirpes distribution work?

In a per stirpes distribution, each branch of the family receives an equal share of the assets. If a beneficiary in a particular branch has passed away, their share is divided equally among their surviving descendants in that branch.

What is the rationale behind a per stirpes distribution?

The per stirpes distribution is based on the principle of preserving family lines and ensuring that assets are passed down to multiple generations. It ensures that the descendants of a deceased beneficiary receive their rightful share instead of it being divided equally among all beneficiaries.

How does a per capita distribution work?

In a per capita distribution, each beneficiary receives an equal share of the assets, regardless of their family line or branch. If a beneficiary has passed away, their share is redistributed equally among the remaining living beneficiaries.

What is the rationale behind a per capita distribution?

The per capita distribution aims to provide an equal distribution of assets among all beneficiaries, regardless of their family relationships. It treats all beneficiaries equally and does not prioritize specific family lines or branches.

Which distribution method is commonly used?

The choice between per stirpes and per capita distribution depends on the individual’s preferences and their specific estate planning goals. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriate choice may vary depending on family dynamics and the nature of the assets being distributed.

Can a person choose between per stirpes and per capita distribution?

Yes, an individual can choose between per stirpes and per capita distribution when creating a will or trust. It is important to consult with an estate planning attorney to understand the implications of each distribution method and make an informed decision based on personal circumstances.